re PR c/39525 ([easy to fix bug] Docs for C99 "designated initializers" isn't…

re PR c/39525 ([easy to fix bug] Docs for C99 "designated initializers" isn't clear what happens to omitted field members)

	PR c/39525
	* doc/extend.texi (Designated Inits): Describe what happens to omitted
	field members.

From-SVN: r208835

gcc/ChangeLog

 2014-03-26  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
 
+	PR c/39525
+	* doc/extend.texi (Designated Inits): Describe what happens to omitted
+	field members.
+
+2014-03-26  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>
+
 	PR other/59545
 	* ira-color.c (update_conflict_hard_regno_costs): Perform the
 	multiplication in unsigned type.

gcc/doc/extend.texi

@@ -1967,6 +1967,9 @@ Another syntax that has the same meaning, obsolete since GCC 2.5, is
 struct point p = @{ y: yvalue, x: xvalue @};
 @end smallexample
 
+Omitted field members are implicitly initialized the same as objects
+that have static storage duration.
+
 @cindex designators
 The @samp{[@var{index}]} or @samp{.@var{fieldname}} is known as a
 @dfn{designator}.  You can also use a designator (or the obsolete colon