Commit 187fd695 by Philippe De Muyter Committed by Jeff Law

x-mot3300 (XCFLAGS): Fixed to match stb.o, not f/stb.o.

8
        * m68k/x-mot3300 (XCFLAGS): Fixed to match stb.o, not f/stb.o.

From-SVN: r27299
parent 332f27af
...@@ -5,11 +5,13 @@ ALLOCA=alloca.o ...@@ -5,11 +5,13 @@ ALLOCA=alloca.o
# Since ss-950318, with jump optimization enabled, "as" issues a warning # Since ss-950318, with jump optimization enabled, "as" issues a warning
# when assembling combine.s : # when assembling combine.s :
# aline nnnnn : Warning: Table overflow: some optimizations lost (SDIs) # aline nnnnn : Warning: Table overflow: some optimizations lost (SDIs)
# but later "ld" complains with # but later "/bin/ld" complains with
# ld: relocation entry found for non-relocatable symbol in combine.o # ld: relocation entry found for non-relocatable symbol in combine.o
# and the produced "cc1" fails with SIGSEGV # and the produced "cc1" fails with SIGSEGV
# and "/usr/local/bin/ld" merely fails with
# collect2: ld terminated with signal 11, core dumped
# Another possible fix would be to split combine.c. # Another possible fix would be to split combine.c.
# Since ss-961013, the same happens for expr.c compiled by gcc, but not by cc; # Since ss-961013, the same happens for expr.c compiled by gcc, but not by cc;
# and for cp/decl.c; aren't those files too big ? # and for cp/decl.c; aren't those files too big ?
# With egcs-970910, this also happens for f/expr.o and f/stb.o # With egcs-1.1.2, this also happens for f/expr.o and f/stb.o
XCFLAGS=`case $@ in combine.o|expr.o|decl.o|f/expr.o|f/stb.o) echo -Wa,-j;;esac` XCFLAGS=`case $@ in combine.o|expr.o|decl.o|stb.o) echo -Wa,-j;;esac`
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment