[AArch64] Fix PR target/63874

     In this PR we have a situation where we aren't really detecting
weak references vs weak definitions. If one has a weak definition that
binds locally there's no reason not to put out PC relative
relocations.

However if you have a genuine weak reference that is known not to bind
locally it makes very little sense to put out an entry into the
literal pool which doesn't always work with DSOs and shared objects.

Tested aarch64-none-linux-gnu bootstrap and regression test with no
regressions

2016-07-04  Ramana Radhakrishnan  <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>

	PR target/63874
	* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_classify_symbol): Fix
	typo in comment.  Only force to memory if it is a weak
	external reference.

2016-07-04  Ramana Radhakrishnan  <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>

	PR target/63874
	* gcc.target/aarch64/pr63874.c: New test.

From-SVN: r237957

gcc/ChangeLog

+2016-07-04  Ramana Radhakrishnan  <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>
+
+	PR target/63874
+	* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_classify_symbol): Fix
+	typo in comment.  Only force to memory if it is a weak
+	external reference.
+
 2016-07-04  Matthew Wahab  <matthew.wahab@arm.com>
 	    Jiong Wang  <jiong.wang@arm.com>
 

gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c

@@ -9423,15 +9423,18 @@ aarch64_classify_symbol (rtx x, rtx offset)
       switch (aarch64_cmodel)
 	{
 	case AARCH64_CMODEL_TINY:
-	  /* When we retreive symbol + offset address, we have to make sure
+	  /* When we retrieve symbol + offset address, we have to make sure
 	     the offset does not cause overflow of the final address.  But
 	     we have no way of knowing the address of symbol at compile time
 	     so we can't accurately say if the distance between the PC and
 	     symbol + offset is outside the addressible range of +/-1M in the
 	     TINY code model.  So we rely on images not being greater than
 	     1M and cap the offset at 1M and anything beyond 1M will have to
-	     be loaded using an alternative mechanism.  */
-	  if (SYMBOL_REF_WEAK (x)
+	     be loaded using an alternative mechanism.  Furthermore if the
+	     symbol is a weak reference to something that isn't known to
+	     resolve to a symbol in this module, then force to memory.  */
+	  if ((SYMBOL_REF_WEAK (x)
+	       && !aarch64_symbol_binds_local_p (x))
 	      || INTVAL (offset) < -1048575 || INTVAL (offset) > 1048575)
 	    return SYMBOL_FORCE_TO_MEM;
 	  return SYMBOL_TINY_ABSOLUTE;
@@ -9439,7 +9442,8 @@ aarch64_classify_symbol (rtx x, rtx offset)
 	case AARCH64_CMODEL_SMALL:
 	  /* Same reasoning as the tiny code model, but the offset cap here is
 	     4G.  */
-	  if (SYMBOL_REF_WEAK (x)
+	  if ((SYMBOL_REF_WEAK (x)
+	       && !aarch64_symbol_binds_local_p (x))
 	      || !IN_RANGE (INTVAL (offset), HOST_WIDE_INT_C (-4294967263),
 			    HOST_WIDE_INT_C (4294967264)))
 	    return SYMBOL_FORCE_TO_MEM;

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2016-07-04  Ramana Radhakrishnan  <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>
+
+	PR target/63874
+	* gcc.target/aarch64/pr63874.c: New test.
+
 2016-07-04  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
 
 	* g++.dg/header.c: New.

gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr63874.c

+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "Not applicable for mcmodel=large" { aarch64*-*-* }  { "-mcmodel=large" } { "" } } */
+
+extern void __attribute__((weak)) foo_weakref (void);
+void __attribute__((weak, noinline)) bar (void)
+{
+ return;
+}
+void (*f) (void);
+void (*g) (void);
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ f = &foo_weakref;
+ g = &bar;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "adr*foo_weakref" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\\.(word|xword)\tbar" } } */