Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
11a6bfd0
Commit
11a6bfd0
authored
Nov 12, 1999
by
Vladimir Makarov
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Removing one unnecessary comment. It should be in the previous i960.h patch.
From-SVN: r30512
parent
bcf783f4
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
4 deletions
+0
-4
gcc/config/i960/i960.h
+0
-4
No files found.
gcc/config/i960/i960.h
View file @
11a6bfd0
...
@@ -612,10 +612,6 @@ extern int hard_regno_mode_ok ();
...
@@ -612,10 +612,6 @@ extern int hard_regno_mode_ok ();
/* ??? It isn't clear to me why this is here. Perhaps because of a bug (since
/* ??? It isn't clear to me why this is here. Perhaps because of a bug (since
fixed) in the definition of INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET which would have
fixed) in the definition of INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET which would have
caused this to fail. */
caused this to fail. */
/* ??? Must check current_function_has_nonlocal_goto, otherwise frame pointer
elimination messes up nonlocal goto sequences. I think this works for other
targets because they use indirect jumps for the return which disables fp
elimination. */
#define FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED (! leaf_function_p ())
#define FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED (! leaf_function_p ())
/* Definitions for register eliminations.
/* Definitions for register eliminations.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment