Commit 11a6bfd0 by Vladimir Makarov

Removing one unnecessary comment. It should be in the previous i960.h patch.

From-SVN: r30512
parent bcf783f4
...@@ -612,10 +612,6 @@ extern int hard_regno_mode_ok (); ...@@ -612,10 +612,6 @@ extern int hard_regno_mode_ok ();
/* ??? It isn't clear to me why this is here. Perhaps because of a bug (since /* ??? It isn't clear to me why this is here. Perhaps because of a bug (since
fixed) in the definition of INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET which would have fixed) in the definition of INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET which would have
caused this to fail. */ caused this to fail. */
/* ??? Must check current_function_has_nonlocal_goto, otherwise frame pointer
elimination messes up nonlocal goto sequences. I think this works for other
targets because they use indirect jumps for the return which disables fp
elimination. */
#define FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED (! leaf_function_p ()) #define FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED (! leaf_function_p ())
/* Definitions for register eliminations. /* Definitions for register eliminations.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment