Commit 0a387eca by Richard Biener Committed by Richard Biener

lto.c (gimple_types, [...]): Remove old merging code and statistics.

2013-10-14  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>

	lto/
	* lto.c (gimple_types, type_hash_cache, struct type_pair_d,
	type_pair_cache, lookup_type_pair, struct sccs, next_dfs_num,
	gtc_next_dfs_num, compare_type_names_p, gtc_visit,
	gimple_types_compatible_p_1, gimple_types_compatible_p,
	visit, iterative_hash_name, struct type_hash_pair,
	type_hash_pair_compare, iterative_hash_gimple_type, gimple_type_hash,
	gimple_type_eq, gimple_register_type, num_not_merged_types,
	num_not_merged_types_in_same_scc, num_not_merged_types_trees,
	num_not_merged_types_in_same_scc_trees): Remove old merging code
	and statistics.
	(lto_read_decls): Do not run old merging code in parallel.
	(read_cgraph_and_symbols): Do not init/free old merging
	data structures.
	(print_lto_report_1): Do not report differences of old vs. new
	merging code.

From-SVN: r203533
parent 055416a8
2013-10-14 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
* lto.c (gimple_types, type_hash_cache, struct type_pair_d,
type_pair_cache, lookup_type_pair, struct sccs, next_dfs_num,
gtc_next_dfs_num, compare_type_names_p, gtc_visit,
gimple_types_compatible_p_1, gimple_types_compatible_p,
visit, iterative_hash_name, struct type_hash_pair,
type_hash_pair_compare, iterative_hash_gimple_type, gimple_type_hash,
gimple_type_eq, gimple_register_type, num_not_merged_types,
num_not_merged_types_in_same_scc, num_not_merged_types_trees,
num_not_merged_types_in_same_scc_trees): Remove old merging code
and statistics.
(lto_read_decls): Do not run old merging code in parallel.
(read_cgraph_and_symbols): Do not init/free old merging
data structures.
(print_lto_report_1): Do not report differences of old vs. new
merging code.
2013-10-14 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
* lto-lang.c (lto_init): Do not re-init canonical types here.
(lto_register_canonical_types): Move to ...
* lto.c (lto_register_canonical_types): ... here.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment