Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
09aa6559
Commit
09aa6559
authored
Apr 25, 1993
by
Jim Wilson
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
(output_load_address, output_size_for_block_move,
output_block_move): Ifdef out. From-SVN: r4219
parent
9bb7ffda
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
13 additions
and
0 deletions
+13
-0
gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c
+13
-0
No files found.
gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c
View file @
09aa6559
...
...
@@ -1549,6 +1549,18 @@ output_move_with_extension (operands)
abort
();
}
#if 0
/* ??? These are only used by the movstrsi pattern, but we get better code
in general without that, because emit_block_move can do just as good a
job as this function does when alignment and size are known. When they
aren't known, a call to strcpy may be faster anyways, because it is
likely to be carefully crafted assembly language code, and below we just
do a byte-wise copy.
Also, emit_block_move expands into multiple read/write RTL insns, which
can then be optimized, whereas our movstrsi pattern can not be optimized
at all. */
/* Load the address specified by OPERANDS[3] into the register
specified by OPERANDS[0].
...
...
@@ -1825,6 +1837,7 @@ output_block_move (operands)
return "";
}
#endif
/* Output reasonable peephole for set-on-condition-code insns.
Note that these insns assume a particular way of defining
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment