combine.c (try_combine): Fix typo in comment.

	* combine.c (try_combine): Fix typo in comment.
	* expr.c (expand_expr): Likewise.
	* config/i370/i370.md (untyped_call): Likewise.

From-SVN: r42655

gcc/ChangeLog

+2001-05-27  Lars Brinkhoff  <lars@nocrew.org>
+
+	* combine.c (try_combine): Fix typo in comment.
+	* expr.c (expand_expr): Likewise.
+	* config/i370/i370.md (untyped_call): Likewise.
+
 2001-05-26  Bruce Korb  <bkorb@gnu.org>
 
 	* fixinc/fixtests.c(stdc_0_in_system_headers_test): Must return "FIX"

gcc/combine.c

@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ cant_combine_insn_p (insn)
    Here I1 and I2 appear earlier than I3.
    I1 can be zero; then we combine just I2 into I3.
 
-   It we are combining three insns and the resulting insn is not recognized,
+   If we are combining three insns and the resulting insn is not recognized,
    try splitting it into two insns.  If that happens, I2 and I3 are retained
    and I1 is pseudo-deleted by turning it into a NOTE.  Otherwise, I1 and I2
    are pseudo-deleted.

gcc/config/i370/i370.md

@@ -4703,8 +4703,8 @@ check_label_emit ();
 ;; Call subroutine returning any type.
 ;; This instruction pattern appears to be used only by the
 ;; expand_builtin_apply definition for __builtin_apply.  It is needed
-;; since call_value might return an in in r15 or a float in fpr0 (r16)
-;; and the builtin code calla abort since the reg is ambiguous. Well,
+;; since call_value might return an int in r15 or a float in fpr0 (r16)
+;; and the builtin code calls abort since the reg is ambiguous. Well,
 ;; the below is probably broken anyway, we just want to go for now.
 ;;
 (define_expand "untyped_call"

gcc/expr.c

@@ -6344,7 +6344,7 @@ expand_expr (exp, target, tmode, modifier)
 			       copy_rtx (XEXP (DECL_RTL (exp), 0)));
 
       /* If we got something, return it.  But first, set the alignment
-	 the address is a register.  */
+	 if the address is a register.  */
       if (temp != 0)
 	{
 	  if (GET_CODE (temp) == MEM && GET_CODE (XEXP (temp, 0)) == REG)