Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
029e256e
Commit
029e256e
authored
Sep 25, 2003
by
Daniel Jacobowitz
Committed by
Daniel Jacobowitz
Sep 25, 2003
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
* acx.m4 (AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR): New.
From-SVN: r71776
parent
b033df90
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
19 additions
and
0 deletions
+19
-0
config/ChangeLog
+4
-0
config/acx.m4
+15
-0
No files found.
config/ChangeLog
View file @
029e256e
2003-09-24 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* acx.m4 (AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR): New.
2003-07-07 Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
* gettext.m4: Delete all former contents.
...
...
config/acx.m4
View file @
029e256e
...
...
@@ -140,3 +140,18 @@ else
$1="$ac_cv_prog_$1"
fi
]) []dnl # NCN_STRICT_CHECK_TARGET_TOOL
###
# AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR
# Used for autoconf 2.5x to force AC_PREPROC_IFELSE to reject code which
# triggers warnings from the preprocessor. Will be in autoconf 2.58.
# For now, using this also overrides header checks to use only the
# preprocessor (matches 2.13 behavior; matching 2.58's behavior is a
# bit harder from here).
# Eventually autoconf will default to checking headers with the compiler
# instead, and we'll have to do this differently.
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR],
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CPP])dnl
m4_define([AC_CHECK_HEADER],m4_defn([_AC_CHECK_HEADER_OLD]))
ac_c_preproc_warn_flag=yes])# AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment