PR83753 was about a case in which we ended up trying to "vectorise"
a group of loads ore stores using single-element vectors.  The problem
was that we were classifying the load or store as VMAT_CONTIGUOUS_PERMUTE
rather than VMAT_CONTIGUOUS, even though it doesn't make sense to permute
a single-element vector.

In that PR it was enough to change get_group_load_store_type,
because vectorisation ended up being unprofitable and so we didn't
take things further.  But when vectorisation is profitable, the same
fix is needed in vectorizable_load and vectorizable_store.

2018-02-08  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>

gcc/
	PR tree-optimization/84265
	* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_store): Don't treat
	VMAT_CONTIGUOUS accesses as grouped.
	(vectorizable_load): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/
	PR tree-optimization/84265
	* gcc.dg/vect/pr84265.c: New test.

From-SVN: r257492