I recently added an assert to cp-gimplify to catch any
TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P being expanded without a target object, and this
testcase found one.  We started out with a TARGET_EXPR around the
CONSTRUCTOR, which would normally mean that the member initializer would be
used to directly initialize the appropriate member of whatever object the
TARGET_EXPR ends up initializing.  But then gimplify_modify_expr_rhs
stripped the TARGET_EXPR in order to assign directly from the elements of
the CONSTRUCTOR, leaving no object for the TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P to
initialize.  I considered setting CONSTRUCTOR_PLACEHOLDER_BOUNDARY in that
case, which implies TARGET_EXPR_NO_ELIDE, but decided that there's no
particular reason the A initializer needs to initialize a member of a B
rather than a distinct A object, so let's only set TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P
when we're using the DMI in a constructor.

	* init.c (get_nsdmi): Set TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P here.
	* typeck2.c (digest_nsdmi_init): Not here.