Unverified Commit fb80d6bd by ZhiangWang033 Committed by GitHub

Update README.md

parent eb2b4ab2
...@@ -1855,6 +1855,13 @@ The following table and screenshots show the CT result. ...@@ -1855,6 +1855,13 @@ The following table and screenshots show the CT result.
<img width="300" src="./images/image12.png" alg="NVDLA_68_CT_Route"> <img width="300" src="./images/image12.png" alg="NVDLA_68_CT_Route">
</p> </p>
**September 19:**
We updated the detailed algorithm for [gridding](https://github.com/TILOS-AI-Institute/MacroPlacement/tree/main/CodeElements/Gridding) in Circuit Training.
In constrast to the open-source [grid_size_selection.py](https://github.com/google-research/circuit_training/blob/main/circuit_training/grouping/grid_size_selection.py) in Circuit Training repo, which still calls the wrapper functions of plc client, our python scripts implement
the gridding from sractch and are easy to understand. The results of our scripts match exactly that of Circuit Training.
## **Pinned (to bottom) question list:** ## **Pinned (to bottom) question list:**
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 1](#Question1).</span>** How does having an initial set of placement locations (from physical synthesis) affect the (relative) quality of the CT result? **<span style="color:blue">[Question 1](#Question1).</span>** How does having an initial set of placement locations (from physical synthesis) affect the (relative) quality of the CT result?
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment