@@ -6357,5 +6357,5 @@ We observe from the above results that CT+DREAMPlace achieves similar result for
...
@@ -6357,5 +6357,5 @@ We observe from the above results that CT+DREAMPlace achieves similar result for
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 11](#Question11).</span>** How does the initial placement generated by different physical synthesis tools affect the CT solution?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 11](#Question11).</span>** How does the initial placement generated by different physical synthesis tools affect the CT solution?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 12](#Question12).</span>** How well does Simulated Annealing (SA) optimize Circuit Training's proxy cost?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 12](#Question12).</span>** How well does Simulated Annealing (SA) optimize Circuit Training's proxy cost?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 13](#Question13).</span>** How good are human macro placements relative to Circuit Training?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 13](#Question13).</span>** How good are human macro placements relative to Circuit Training?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 14](#Question14).</span>** What is the impact on CT results when DREAMPlace is used instead of force-directed placement?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 14](#Question14).</span>** What is the impact on CT results when DREAMPlace is used instead of force-directed placement?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 15](#Question15).</span>** Should we factor in density cost while using DREAMPlace for CT?
**<span style="color:blue">[Question 15](#Question15).</span>** Should we factor in density cost while using DREAMPlace for CT?