Update README.md

Docs/OurProgress/README.md

@@ -5053,7 +5053,7 @@ The following table and screenshots provide details of Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns
 <table>
 <thead>
   <tr>
-    <th colspan="10">Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns CT result when the initial placement information is generated by DC-Topo</th>
+    <th colspan="10">Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns CT result when the initial placement information is generated by Synopsys DC-Topo physical synthesis.</th>
   </tr>
 </thead>
 <tbody>
@@ -5125,11 +5125,11 @@ The following table and screenshots provide details of Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns
 <img width="300" src="./images/Ariane133_NG45_DCTopo_CT_Route.png" alg="Ariane133_NG45_DCTopo_CT_Route">
 </p>
 
-[Link](../../Flows/NanGate45/ariane133/README.md#macro-placement-generated-by-circuit-training-ct) to result of Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns CT macro placement when [Flow-2](../../Flows/figures/flow-2.PNG) (CMP-Genus iSpatial) is used to generate the initial placement solution.
+[Link](../../Flows/NanGate45/ariane133/README.md#macro-placement-generated-by-circuit-training-ct) to result of Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns CT macro placement when [Flow-2](../../Flows/figures/flow-2.PNG) (CMP-Genus iSpatial physical synthesis) is used to generate the initial placement information.
 
 <a id="Question12"></a>
-**<span style="color:blue">Question 12.</span>** How does Simulated Annealing (SA) perform in terms of optimizing the proxy cost?  
-Please find the details of our SA implementation [here](../../CodeElements/SimulatedAnnealing/). We have generated macro placement using SA for Ariane, BlackParrot (Quad-Core) and MemPool Group.
+**<span style="color:blue">Question 12.</span>** How well does Simulated Annealing (SA) optimize the proxy cost?  
+Details of our SA implementation, which we denote as SA-UCSD, are [here](../../CodeElements/SimulatedAnnealing/). We have used SA-UCSD to generate macro placements for Ariane, BlackParrot (Quad-Core) and MemPool Group.
 
 - **Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns**: The configuration that results best proxy cost (wirelength cost: 0.0881, congestion cost: 0.8257, density cost: 0.5084, proxy cost: 0.75515): *action_probs: [0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2], num_actions: 3, max_temperature: 7e-5, num_iters: 50000, seed: 1, spiral_flag: True*
   - The following table and screenshots provide details of Ariane133-NG45-68%-1.3ns SA-UCSD macro placement.
@@ -5301,4 +5301,4 @@ Please find the details of our SA implementation [here](../../CodeElements/Simul
 **<span style="color:blue">[Question 9](#Question9).</span>** Are CT results stable? If not, how much does the outcome vary?  
 **<span style="color:blue">[Question 10](#Question10).</span>** What is the correlation between proxy cost and the postRouteOpt Table 1 metrics?  
 **<span style="color:blue">[Question 11](#Question11).</span>** How does the initial placement generated by different physical synthesis tools affect the CT solution?  
-**<span style="color:blue">[Question 12](#Question12).</span>** How does Simulated Annealing (SA) perform in terms of optimizing the proxy cost?  
\ No newline at end of file
+**<span style="color:blue">[Question 12](#Question12).</span>** How does Simulated Annealing (SA) perform in terms of optimizing the proxy cost?