An obvious place to fill the tree cache is on write-tree, as we're
guaranteed to be able to fill in the whole tree cache.
The way this commit does this is not the most efficient, as we read the
root tree from the odb instead of filling in the cache as we go along,
but it fills the cache such that successive operations (and persisting
the index to disk) will be able to take advantage of the cache, and it
reuses the code we already have for filling the cache.
Filling in the cache as we create the trees would require some
reallocation of the children vector, which is currently not possible
with out pool implementation. A different data structure would likely
allow us to perform this operation at a later date.
