Name |
Last commit
|
Last update |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
analysis.c | ||
dirty.c | ||
recursive.c | ||
renames.c | ||
setup.c | ||
simple.c | ||
submodules.c | ||
trivial.c |
When the commits being merged have multiple merge bases, reverse the order when creating the virtual merge base. This is for compatibility with git's merge-recursive algorithm, and ensures that we build identical trees. Git does this to try to use older merge bases first. Per 8918b0c: > It seems to be the only sane way to do it: when a two-head merge is > done, and the merge-base and one of the two branches agree, the > merge assumes that the other branch has something new. > > If we start creating virtual commits from newer merge-bases, and go > back to older merge-bases, and then merge with newer commits again, > chances are that a patch is lost, _because_ the merge-base and the > head agree on it. Unlikely, yes, but it happened to me.
Name |
Last commit
|
Last update |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
analysis.c | Loading commit data... | |
dirty.c | Loading commit data... | |
recursive.c | Loading commit data... | |
renames.c | Loading commit data... | |
setup.c | Loading commit data... | |
simple.c | Loading commit data... | |
submodules.c | Loading commit data... | |
trivial.c | Loading commit data... |