- 23 Feb, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Like we want to separate libgit2 and utility source code, we want to separate libgit2 and utility tests. Start by moving all the tests into libgit2.
Edward Thomson committed
-
- 12 Nov, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Jason Nader committed
-
- 09 Nov, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Introduce `git_fs_path`, which operates on generic filesystem paths. `git_path` will be kept for only git-specific path functionality (for example, checking for `.git` in a path).
Edward Thomson committed
-
- 17 Oct, 2021 1 commit
-
-
libgit2 has two distinct requirements that were previously solved by `git_buf`. We require: 1. A general purpose string class that provides a number of utility APIs for manipulating data (eg, concatenating, truncating, etc). 2. A structure that we can use to return strings to callers that they can take ownership of. By using a single class (`git_buf`) for both of these purposes, we have confused the API to the point that refactorings are difficult and reasoning about correctness is also difficult. Move the utility class `git_buf` to be called `git_str`: this represents its general purpose, as an internal string buffer class. The name also is an homage to Junio Hamano ("gitstr"). The public API remains `git_buf`, and has a much smaller footprint. It is generally only used as an "out" param with strict requirements that follow the documentation. (Exceptions exist for some legacy APIs to avoid breaking callers unnecessarily.) Utility functions exist to convert a user-specified `git_buf` to a `git_str` so that we can call internal functions, then converting it back again.
Edward Thomson committed
-
- 20 Jul, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Our file utils functions all have a "futils" prefix, e.g. `git_futils_touch`. One would thus naturally guess that their definitions and implementation would live in files "futils.h" and "futils.c", respectively, but in fact they live in "fileops.h". Rename the files to match expectations.
Patrick Steinhardt committed
-
- 19 Jul, 2019 4 commits
-
-
When using templates to initialize a git repository, then git-init(1) will copy over all contents of the template directory. These will be preferred over the default ones created by git-init(1). While we mostly do the same, there is the exception of "HEAD". While we do copy over the template's HEAD file, afterwards we'll immediately re-initialize its contents with either the default "ref: refs/origin/master" or the init option's `initial_head` field. Let's fix the inconsistency with upstream git-init(1) by not overwriting the template HEAD, but only if the user hasn't set `opts.initial_head`. If the `initial_head` field has been supplied, we should use that indifferent from whether the template contained a HEAD file or not. Add tests to verify we correctly use the template directory's HEAD file and that `initial_head` overrides the template.
Patrick Steinhardt committed -
All tests in repo::template have a common pattern of first setting up templates, then settung up the repository that makes use of those templates via several init options. Refactor this pattern into two functions `setup_templates` and `setup_repo` that handle most of that logic to make it easier to spot what a test actually wants to check. Furthermore, this also refactors how we clean up after the tests. Previously, it was a combination of manually calling `cl_fixture_cleanup` and `cl_set_cleanup`, which really is kind of hard to read. This commit refactors this to instead provide the cleaning parameters in the setup functions. All cleanups are then performed in the suite's cleanup function.
Patrick Steinhardt committed -
The repo::template test suite makes use of quite a few local variables that could be consolidated. Do so to make the code easier to read.
Patrick Steinhardt committed -
There's quite a lot of supporting code for our templates and they are an obvious standalone feature. Thus, let's extract those tests into their own suite to also make refactoring of them easier.
Patrick Steinhardt committed
-