- 01 Dec, 2015 3 commits
-
-
tree: mark cloned tree entries as un-pooled
Edward Thomson committed -
When duplicating a `struct git_tree_entry` with `git_tree_entry_dup` the resulting structure is not allocated inside a memory pool. As we do a 1:1 copy of the original struct, though, we also copy the `pooled` field, which is set to `true` for pooled entries. This results in a huge memory leak as we never free tree entries that were duplicated from a pooled tree entry. Fix this by marking the newly duplicated entry as un-pooled.
Patrick Steinhardt committed -
Improvements to tree parsing speed
Edward Thomson committed
-
- 30 Nov, 2015 5 commits
-
-
Compiler warning fixes
Carlos Martín Nieto committed -
Patrick Steinhardt committed
-
Patrick Steinhardt committed
-
Return an error in case the length is too big. Also take this opportunity to have a single allocating function for the size and overflow logic.
Carlos Martín Nieto committed -
Recursive Merge
Carlos Martín Nieto committed
-
- 28 Nov, 2015 4 commits
-
-
This reduces the size of the struct from 32 to 26 bytes, and leaves a single padding byte at the end of the struct (which comes from the zero-length array).
Carlos Martín Nieto committed -
We already know the size due to the `memchr()` so use that information instead of calling `strlen()` on it.
Carlos Martín Nieto committed -
These are rather small allocations, so we end up spending a non-trivial amount of time asking the OS for memory. Since these entries are tied to the lifetime of their tree, we can give the tree a pool so we speed up the allocations.
Carlos Martín Nieto committed -
We've already looked at the filename with `memchr()` and then used `strlen()` to allocate the entry. We already know how much we have to advance to get to the object id, so add the filename length instead of looking at each byte again.
Carlos Martín Nieto committed
-
- 25 Nov, 2015 17 commits
-
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
When building a recursive merge base, allow conflicts to occur. Use the file (with conflict markers) as the common ancestor. The user has already seen and dealt with this conflict by virtue of having a criss-cross merge. If they resolved this conflict identically in both branches, then there will be no conflict in the result. This is the best case scenario. If they did not resolve the conflict identically in the two branches, then we will generate a new conflict. If the user is simply using standard conflict output then the results will be fairly sensible. But if the user is using a mergetool or using diff3 output, then the common ancestor will be a conflict file (itself with diff3 output, haha!). This is quite terrible, but it matches git's behavior.
Edward Thomson committed -
Edward Thomson committed
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
Use annotated commits to act as our virtual bases, instead of regular commits, to avoid polluting the odb with virtual base commits and trees. Instead, build an annotated commit with an index and pointers to the commits that it was merged from.
Edward Thomson committed -
Edward Thomson committed
-
When there are more than two common ancestors, continue merging the virtual base with the additional common ancestors, effectively octopus merging a new virtual base.
Edward Thomson committed -
Edward Thomson committed
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
Edward Thomson committed
-
When the commits to merge have multiple common ancestors, build a "virtual" base tree by merging the common ancestors.
Edward Thomson committed -
Add a simple recursive test - where multiple ancestors exist and creating a virtual merge base from them would prevent a conflict.
Edward Thomson committed -
Edward Thomson committed
-
- 24 Nov, 2015 5 commits
-
-
Memleak fixes
Edward Thomson committed -
checkout: only consider nsecs when built that way
Carlos Martín Nieto committed -
Patrick Steinhardt committed
-
Patrick Steinhardt committed
-
Patrick Steinhardt committed
-
- 23 Nov, 2015 1 commit
-
-
When examining the working directory and determining whether it's up-to-date, only consider the nanoseconds in the index entry when built with `GIT_USE_NSEC`. This prevents us from believing that the working directory is always dirty when the index was originally written with a git client that uinderstands nsecs (like git 2.x).
Edward Thomson committed
-
- 21 Nov, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Fix <0 unsigned comparison (stat.st_size should be an off_t)
Edward Thomson committed -
Jacques Germishuys committed
-
- 20 Nov, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Fix some warnings
Edward Thomson committed -
Stat fixes
Edward Thomson committed -
repository: distinguish sequencer cherry-pick and revert
Edward Thomson committed
-