Commit 82d4c0e6 by Carlos Martín Nieto

revwalk: update the description for the default sorting

It changed from implementation-defined to git's default sorting, as there are
systems (e.g. rebase) which depend on this order. Also specify more explicitly
how you can get git's "date-order".
parent ea1ceb7f
......@@ -25,17 +25,15 @@ GIT_BEGIN_DECL
*/
typedef enum {
/**
* Sort the repository contents in no particular ordering;
* this sorting is arbitrary, implementation-specific
* and subject to change at any time.
* Sort the output with the same default time-order method from git.
* This is the default sorting for new walkers.
*/
GIT_SORT_NONE = 0,
/**
* Sort the repository contents in topological order
* (parents before children); this sorting mode
* can be combined with time sorting.
* Sort the repository contents in topological order (parents before
* children); this sorting mode can be combined with time sorting to
* produce git's "time-order".
*/
GIT_SORT_TOPOLOGICAL = 1 << 0,
......
......@@ -555,10 +555,6 @@ static int prepare_walk(git_revwalk *walk)
}
}
for (list = commits; list; list = list->next) {
printf("%s: commit %s\n", __func__, git_oid_tostr_s(&list->item->oid));
}
if ((error = limit_list(&commits, walk, commits)) < 0)
return error;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment