related work

AAAI2021/Makefile

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ MAKE = make
 file = paper
 
 
-all: paper-writting paper-submission
+all: AAAI
 
 paper-writting:
 	pdflatex -jobname $@ "\newcommand{\submitmode}{false}\input{$(file)}"
@@ -27,6 +27,15 @@ final:
 	pdftops final.pdf
 	ps2pdf14 -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress final.pdf final-output.pdf
 
+
+AAAI:
+	pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
+	pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
+	bibtex $@
+	pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
+	pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
+
+
 push:
 	git push gitlab master:master
 

AAAI2021/paper.tex

@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
 %File: formatting-instructions-latex-2021.tex
 %release 2021.1
 
+%Added by Zidong
 \usepackage{color}
+\newcommand{\rmk}[1]{\textcolor{red}{--[#1]--}}
+\newcommand{\note}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
 
 \usepackage{aaai21}  % DO NOT CHANGE THIS
 \usepackage{times}  % DO NOT CHANGE THIS

AAAI2021/tex/relatedwork.tex

+\section{Related works}
+\label{sec:relatedwork}
+
+%external environmental factors
+Previous works focus on the external environmental factors that impact the
+compositionality of emerged symbolic language. 
+For example, XXX proposed small vocabulary sizes~\cite{}.
+XXX proposed memoryless~\cite{}.
+XXX proposed carefully constructed distractors~\cite{}.
+XXX proposed ease-of-teaching~\cite{}.
+Such factors are deliberately designed, which are too ideal to be true in
+the real world. None of these works realizes the importance of model capacity of
+agent itself. \rmk{this should be largely emphasized.}
+
+
+%measure
+Additionally, to measure the compositionality of emerged symbolic language, many metrics are
+proposed~\cite{}. 
+Widely accepted metrics can be classified into two categories, measuring
+positive signaling~\cite{} and measuring positive listening~\cite{}. The former
+metrics measure the relationship between spoken symbols and received concepts
+\rmk{not clear}, from the perspective of \emph{speakers}. 
+For example,.
+The latter metrics measure the relationship between received symbols and
+predicted concepts \rmk{not clear}, from the perspective of \emph{listeners}.
+For example,. 
+However, these metrics are not appropriate, for they only measure
+compositionality of symbolic language in \emph{unilateral} role\rmk{not sure},
+either speakers or listeners. They can not measure the degree of mutual
+understanding between speakers and listeners, i.e., the concept-symbol mapping
+consistency between speakers and listeners.
+
+
+