Commit 40e00454 by Zidong Du

related work

parent 4131d4c0
......@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ MAKE = make
file = paper
all: paper-writting paper-submission
all: AAAI
paper-writting:
pdflatex -jobname $@ "\newcommand{\submitmode}{false}\input{$(file)}"
......@@ -27,6 +27,15 @@ final:
pdftops final.pdf
ps2pdf14 -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress final.pdf final-output.pdf
AAAI:
pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
bibtex $@
pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
pdflatex -jobname $@ $(file)
push:
git push gitlab master:master
......
......@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
%File: formatting-instructions-latex-2021.tex
%release 2021.1
%Added by Zidong
\usepackage{color}
\newcommand{\rmk}[1]{\textcolor{red}{--[#1]--}}
\newcommand{\note}[1]{\textcolor{red}{#1}}
\usepackage{aaai21} % DO NOT CHANGE THIS
\usepackage{times} % DO NOT CHANGE THIS
......
\section{Related works}
\label{sec:relatedwork}
%external environmental factors
Previous works focus on the external environmental factors that impact the
compositionality of emerged symbolic language.
For example, XXX proposed small vocabulary sizes~\cite{}.
XXX proposed memoryless~\cite{}.
XXX proposed carefully constructed distractors~\cite{}.
XXX proposed ease-of-teaching~\cite{}.
Such factors are deliberately designed, which are too ideal to be true in
the real world. None of these works realizes the importance of model capacity of
agent itself. \rmk{this should be largely emphasized.}
%measure
Additionally, to measure the compositionality of emerged symbolic language, many metrics are
proposed~\cite{}.
Widely accepted metrics can be classified into two categories, measuring
positive signaling~\cite{} and measuring positive listening~\cite{}. The former
metrics measure the relationship between spoken symbols and received concepts
\rmk{not clear}, from the perspective of \emph{speakers}.
For example,.
The latter metrics measure the relationship between received symbols and
predicted concepts \rmk{not clear}, from the perspective of \emph{listeners}.
For example,.
However, these metrics are not appropriate, for they only measure
compositionality of symbolic language in \emph{unilateral} role\rmk{not sure},
either speakers or listeners. They can not measure the degree of mutual
understanding between speakers and listeners, i.e., the concept-symbol mapping
consistency between speakers and listeners.
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment