minor tweak of the runtime doc to fix some grammatical and expression issues (#828)

docs/dev/runtime.md

 # TVM Runtime System
 
-TVM support multiple programming languages for compiler stack development and deployment.
-In this note, we explain the key element of TVM runtime.
+TVM supports multiple programming languages for the compiler stack development and deployment.
+In this note, we explain the key elements of the TVM runtime.
 
 ![](http://www.tvmlang.org/images/release/tvm_flexible.png)
 
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ We need to satisfy quite a few interesting requirements
 
 - Deployment: invoke the compiled function from python/javascript/c++ language.
 - Debug: define a function in python and call that from a compiled function.
-- Link: write driver code to call device specific code(CUDA) and call it from compiled host function.
+- Link: write driver code to call device specific code (CUDA) and call it from compiled host function.
 - Prototype: define an IR pass from python and call that from C++ backend.
 - Expose: compiler stack developed in c++ to front-end (i.e, python)
-- Experiment: ship a compiled function to an embedded device directly run there.
+- Experiment: ship a compiled function to an embedded device to directly run there.
 
 We want to be able to define a function from any language and call from another.
 We also want the runtime core to be minimal to deploy to embedded devices.
@@ -41,9 +41,9 @@ void CallPacked() {
 ```
 In the above codeblock, we defined a PackedFunc MyAdd. It takes two arguments
 : ```args``` represents input arguments and ```rv``` represents return value.
-The function is type-erased, which means the function signature does not restrict which input type to pass in or type to return.
+The function is type-erased, which means that the function signature does not restrict which input type to pass in or type to return.
 Under the hood, when we call a PackedFunc, it packs the input arguments to TVMArgs on stack,
-and get the result back via TVMRetValue.
+and gets the result back via TVMRetValue.
 
 Thanks to template tricks in C++, we can call a PackedFunc just like a normal function. Because of its type-erased nature, we can call a PackedFunc from dynamic languages like python, without additional glue code for each new type function created.
 The following example registers PackedFunc in C++ and calls from python.
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ The restriction makes the implementation simple without the need of serializatio
 Despite being minimum, the PackedFunc is sufficient for the use-case of deep learning deployment as
 most functions only take DLTensor or numbers.
 
-Since one PackedFunc can take another PackedFunc as argument,
+Since one PackedFunc can take another PackedFunc as an argument,
 we can pass functions from python(as PackedFunc) to C++.
 ```c++
 TVM_REGISTER_GLOBAL("callhello")
@@ -97,15 +97,15 @@ callhello(f)
 ```
 
 TVM provides a [minimum C API](https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/blob/master/include/tvm/runtime/c_runtime_api.h),
-that allows us to embedded the PackedFunc into any languages. Besides python, so far we supported
+which allows us to embed the PackedFunc into any languages. Besides python, so far we supported
 [java](https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/tree/master/jvm) and [javascript](https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/tree/master/web).
-This philosophy of embedded API is very like Lua, except that we don't have a new language and uses C++.
+This philosophy of embedded API is very like Lua, except that we don't have a new language but use C++.
 
 One fun fact about PackedFunc is that we use it for both compiler and deployment stack.
 - All TVM's compiler pass functions are exposed to frontend as PackedFunc, see [here](https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/tree/master/src/api)
-- The compiled modules also returns compiled function as PackedFunc
+- The compiled module also returns the compiled function as PackedFunc
 
-To keep the runtime minimum, we isolated the IR Node support from the deployment runtime. The resulting runtime takes around 200K - 600K depending on how many runtime driver modules(e.g., CUDA) get included.
+To keep the runtime minimum, we isolated the IR Node support from the deployment runtime. The resulting runtime takes around 200K - 600K depending on how many runtime driver modules (e.g., CUDA) get included.
 
 The overhead of calling into PackedFunc vs. a normal function is small, as it is only saving a few values on the stack.
 So it is OK as long as we don't wrap small functions.
@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ In summary, the PackedFunc is the universal glue in TVM where we use it extensiv
 
 ## Module
 
-Since TVM support multiple types of devices, we need to support different type of drivers.
-We have to use driver API to load the kernel, set up the argument in packed format and perform kernel launch.
-We also need to patch up the driver API so that the exposed functions is threadsafe.
+Since TVM supports multiple types of devices, we need to support different type of drivers.
+We have to use the driver API to load the kernel, set up the argument in packed format and perform kernel launch.
+We also need to patch up the driver API so that the exposed functions are threadsafe.
 So we often need to implement these driver glues in C++ and expose them to the user.
 We can certainly not do it for each type of functions, so again PackedFunc is our answer.
 
@@ -130,32 +130,32 @@ of new device easy, and we do not need to redo the host code generation for each
 ## Remote Deployment
 
 The PackedFunc and Module system also makes it easy to ship the function into remote devices directly.
-Under the hood, we have a RPCModule that serializes the arguments and do the data movement and launches the computation on the remote.
+Under the hood, we have an RPCModule that serializes the arguments to do the data movement and launches the computation on the remote.
 
 ![](http://www.tvmlang.org/images/release/tvm_rpc.png)
 
 The RPC server itself is minimum and can be bundled into the runtime. We can start a minimum TVM
-RPC server on iPhone/android/raspberry pi or even your browser. The cross compilation on server and shipping of the module for testing can be done in the same script. Checkout
+RPC server on iPhone/android/raspberry pi or even the browser. The cross compilation on server and shipping of the module for testing can be done in the same script. Checkout
 [Cross compilation and RPC tutorial](http://docs.tvmlang.org/tutorials/deployment/cross_compilation_and_rpc.html#sphx-glr-tutorials-deployment-cross-compilation-and-rpc-py)  for more details.
 
-This instant feedback gives us a lot of advantages. For example, to test the correctness of generated code on iPhone, we no longer have to write test-cases in swift/objective-c from scratch -- We can use RPC to execute on iPhone copy the result back and do verification on my host via numpy. We can also do the profiling using the same script.
+This instant feedback gives us a lot of advantages. For example, to test the correctness of generated code on iPhone, we no longer have to write test-cases in swift/objective-c from scratch -- We can use RPC to execute on iPhone, copy the result back and do verification on the host via numpy. We can also do the profiling using the same script.
 
 ## TVM Node and Compiler Stack
 
 As we mentioned earlier, we build compiler stack API on top of the PackedFunc runtime system.
-We faced a constant changing the compiler API for the need of research. We need a new language object or IR node from now and then when we want to test out new primitives.
+We faced a constant changing of the compiler API for the need of research. We need a new language object or IR node whenever we want to test out new primitives.
 However, we don't want to change our API from time to time. Besides that, we also want to
 
 - be able to serialize any language object and IRs
 - be able to explore, print, and manipulate the IR objects in front-end language to do quick prototyping.
 
 We introduced a base class, called [Node](https://github.com/dmlc/HalideIR/blob/master/src/tvm/node.h#L52) to solve this problem.
-All the language object in compiler stack is a subclass of Node. Each node contains a string type_key that uniquely identifies
-the type of object. We choose string instead of int as type key so new Node class can be added in decentralized fashion without
+All the language object in the compiler stack is a subclass of Node. Each node contains a string type_key that uniquely identifies
+the type of object. We choose string instead of int as type key so new Node class can be added in the decentralized fashion without
 adding the code back to the central repo. To ease the speed of dispatching, we allocate an integer type_index at runtime for each type_key.
 
-Since usually one Node object could be referenced in multiple places in the language. We use a shared_ptr to keep
-track of reference. We use NodeRef class to represents a reference to the Node.
+Since usually one Node object could be referenced in multiple places in the language, we use a shared_ptr to keep
+track of reference. We use NodeRef class to represent a reference to the Node.
 We can roughly view NodeRef class as shared_ptr to the Node container.
 We can also define subclass NodeRef to hold each subtypes of Node. Each Node class needs to define the VisitAttr function.
 
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ class TensorNode : public Node {
 ```
 In the above examples, both ```Operation``` and ```Array<Expr>``` are NodeRef.
 The VisitAttrs gives us a reflection API to visit each member of the object.
-We can use this function to visit the node any serialize any language object recursively.
+We can use this function to visit the node and serialize any language object recursively.
 It also allows us to get members of an object easily in front-end language.
 For example, in the following code, we accessed the op field of the TensorNode.
 
@@ -220,13 +220,13 @@ print(x.op.name)
 
 New Node can be added to C++ without changing the front-end runtime, making it easy to make extensions to the compiler stack.
 Note that this is not the fastest way to expose members to front-end language, but might be one of the simplest
-approach possible. We also find it fits our purposes as we mainly use python for testing and prototyping and still use c++
+approaches possible. We also find that it fits our purposes as we mainly use python for testing and prototyping and still use c++
 to do the heavy lifting job.
 
 ## Implementation Details
 
 Each argument in PackedFunc contains a union value [TVMValue](https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/blob/master/include/tvm/runtime/c_runtime_api.h#L122)
-and a type code. This design allows the dynamically typed language to convert to the corresponding type directly, and statically typed language
+and a type code. This design allows the dynamically typed language to convert to the corresponding type directly, and statically typed language to
 do runtime type checking during conversion.
 
 The relevant files are