re PR tree-optimization/37305 (ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:397)

2008-09-01  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

	PR tree-optimization/37305
	* tree-ssa-ccp.c (ccp_fold): Do not set TREE_OVERFLOW on
	the result of constant conversions.
	(fold_gimple_assign): Likewise.

	* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37305.c: New testcase.

From-SVN: r139864

gcc/ChangeLog

+2008-09-01  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
+
+	PR tree-optimization/37305
+	* tree-ssa-ccp.c (ccp_fold): Do not set TREE_OVERFLOW on
+	the result of constant conversions.
+	(fold_gimple_assign): Likewise.
+
 2008-09-01  Andrey Belevantsev  <abel@ispras.ru>
 
 	* sel-sched-ir.c (cmp_v_in_regset_pool): Surround with 

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

+2008-09-01  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
+
+	PR tree-optimization/37305
+	* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37305.c: New testcase.
+
 2008-09-01  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
 
 	PR middle-end/36449

gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37305.c

+typedef int int32_t;
+typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
+static inline int
+safe_add_s_s (int si1, int si2)
+{
+  if ((si1 > 0) && (si2 > 0) && (si1 > (si2)) || (si1 < 0) && (si2 < 0)
+      && (si1 < ((-__INT_MAX__ - 1) - si2)))
+    return si1;
+}
+
+uint32_t g_8;
+uint32_t
+func_24 (int32_t p_25)
+{
+  uint32_t l_30 = -1L;
+  if ((safe_mod_u_u (1, 1)) | (safe_add_s_s (g_8, l_30)))
+    return 1;
+}
+

gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c

@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ ccp_fold (gimple stmt)
                  so this should almost always return a simplified RHS.  */
               tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
               tree op0 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
+	      tree res;
 
               /* Simplify the operand down to a constant.  */
               if (TREE_CODE (op0) == SSA_NAME)
@@ -976,7 +977,20 @@ ccp_fold (gimple stmt)
 		  return op0;
 		}
 
-              return fold_unary (subcode, gimple_expr_type (stmt), op0);
+              res = fold_unary (subcode, gimple_expr_type (stmt), op0);
+
+	      /* If the operation was a conversion do _not_ mark a
+	         resulting constant with TREE_OVERFLOW if the original
+		 constant was not.  These conversions have implementation
+		 defined behavior and retaining the TREE_OVERFLOW flag
+		 here would confuse later passes such as VRP.  */
+	      if (res
+		  && TREE_CODE (res) == INTEGER_CST
+		  && TREE_CODE (op0) == INTEGER_CST
+		  && CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (subcode))
+		TREE_OVERFLOW (res) = TREE_OVERFLOW (op0);
+
+	      return res;
             }
 
           case GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS:
@@ -2644,17 +2658,27 @@ fold_gimple_assign (gimple_stmt_iterator *si)
       break;
 
     case GIMPLE_UNARY_RHS:
-      result = fold_unary (subcode,
-                           gimple_expr_type (stmt),
-                           gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt));
+      {
+	tree rhs = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
 
+	result = fold_unary (subcode, gimple_expr_type (stmt), rhs);
 	if (result)
 	  {
+	    /* If the operation was a conversion do _not_ mark a
+	       resulting constant with TREE_OVERFLOW if the original
+	       constant was not.  These conversions have implementation
+	       defined behavior and retaining the TREE_OVERFLOW flag
+	       here would confuse later passes such as VRP.  */
+	    if (CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (subcode)
+		&& TREE_CODE (result) == INTEGER_CST
+		&& TREE_CODE (rhs) == INTEGER_CST)
+	      TREE_OVERFLOW (result) = TREE_OVERFLOW (rhs);
+
 	    STRIP_USELESS_TYPE_CONVERSION (result);
 	    if (valid_gimple_rhs_p (result))
 	      return result;
 	  }
-      else if (CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt))
+	else if (CONVERT_EXPR_CODE_P (subcode)
 		 && POINTER_TYPE_P (gimple_expr_type (stmt))
 		 && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt))))
 	  {
@@ -2664,6 +2688,7 @@ fold_gimple_assign (gimple_stmt_iterator *si)
 	    if (t)
 	      return t;
 	  }
+      }
       break;
 
     case GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS: