exp_ch9.adb, [...]: Minor reformatting.

2012-05-15  Robert Dewar  <dewar@adacore.com>

	* exp_ch9.adb, sem_ch9.adb, sem_ch13.adb: Minor reformatting.

From-SVN: r187506

gcc/ada/ChangeLog

 2012-05-15  Robert Dewar  <dewar@adacore.com>
 
+	* exp_ch9.adb, sem_ch9.adb, sem_ch13.adb: Minor reformatting.
+
+2012-05-15  Robert Dewar  <dewar@adacore.com>
+
 	* g-comlin.adb, g-comlin.ads: Minor reformatting.
 
 2012-05-15  Vincent Pucci  <pucci@adacore.com>

gcc/ada/exp_ch9.adb

@@ -3253,6 +3253,9 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
          begin
             --  Get the type size
 
+            --  Surely this should be Known_Static_Esize if you are about
+            --  to assume you can do UI_To_Int on it! ???
+
             if Known_Esize (Comp_Type) then
                Typ_Size := UI_To_Int (Esize (Comp_Type));
 
@@ -3260,6 +3263,8 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
             --  the RM_Size (Value_Size) since it may have been set by an
             --  explicit representation clause.
 
+            --  And how do we know this is statically known???
+
             else
                Typ_Size := UI_To_Int (RM_Size (Comp_Type));
             end if;
@@ -3359,6 +3364,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
               (Stmts, Compare, Unsigned, Comp, Saved_Comp, Current_Comp);
 
             --  Generate:
+
             --    exit when System.Atomic_Primitives.Atomic_Compare_Exchange
             --                (Comp'Address,
             --                 Interfaces.Unsigned (Saved_Comp),
@@ -3397,16 +3403,15 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
 
             if Present (Label_Id) then
                Label := Make_Label (Loc, Label_Id);
-
                Append_To (Decls,
                  Make_Implicit_Label_Declaration (Loc,
                    Defining_Identifier => Entity (Label_Id),
                    Label_Construct     => Label));
-
                Append_To (Stmts, Label);
             end if;
 
             --  Generate:
+
             --    loop
             --       declare
             --          <Decls>
@@ -3446,8 +3451,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
             Build_Protected_Sub_Specification (N, Prot_Typ, Unprotected_Mode),
           Declarations               => Decls,
           Handled_Statement_Sequence =>
-            Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc,
-              Statements => Stmts));
+            Make_Handled_Sequence_Of_Statements (Loc, Statements => Stmts));
    end Build_Lock_Free_Unprotected_Subprogram_Body;
 
    -------------------------
@@ -8258,7 +8262,6 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
          while Present (Formal) loop
             Append_To (Actuals,
               Make_Identifier (Loc, Chars (Defining_Identifier (Formal))));
-
             Next (Formal);
          end loop;
 
@@ -8269,6 +8272,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
                   Name =>
                     New_Reference_To (Corresponding_Spec (Prot_Bod), Loc),
                   Parameter_Associations => Actuals));
+
          else
             pragma Assert (Nkind (Spec) = N_Function_Specification);
 
@@ -8621,7 +8625,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
 
             return True;
 
-         --  Any other types will be checked by the back-end
+         --  Any other type will be checked by the back-end
 
          else
             return True;
@@ -8637,21 +8641,20 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
          --  All semantic checks already done in Sem_Prag
 
          Prot_Proc    : constant Entity_Id :=
-                       Defining_Unit_Name
-                         (Specification (Current_Node));
+                          Defining_Unit_Name (Specification (Current_Node));
 
          Proc_Address : constant Node_Id :=
                           Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
-                          Prefix => New_Reference_To (Prot_Proc, Loc),
+                            Prefix         =>
+                              New_Reference_To (Prot_Proc, Loc),
                             Attribute_Name => Name_Address);
 
          RTS_Call     : constant Entity_Id :=
                           Make_Procedure_Call_Statement (Loc,
                             Name                   =>
-                              New_Reference_To (
-                                RTE (RE_Register_Interrupt_Handler), Loc),
-                            Parameter_Associations =>
-                              New_List (Proc_Address));
+                              New_Reference_To
+                                (RTE (RE_Register_Interrupt_Handler), Loc),
+                            Parameter_Associations => New_List (Proc_Address));
       begin
          Append_Freeze_Action (Prot_Proc, RTS_Call);
       end Register_Handler;
@@ -8857,16 +8860,15 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
                      Protection_Subtype :=
                        New_Reference_To (RTE (RE_Protection), Loc);
                   end if;
+
                else
                   Protection_Subtype :=
-                    Make_Subtype_Indication
-                      (Sloc => Loc,
+                    Make_Subtype_Indication (Loc,
                        Subtype_Mark =>
                          New_Reference_To
                            (RTE (RE_Static_Interrupt_Protection), Loc),
                        Constraint =>
-                         Make_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint (
-                           Sloc => Loc,
+                         Make_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint (Loc,
                            Constraints => New_List (
                              Entry_Count_Expr,
                              Make_Integer_Literal (Loc, Num_Attach_Handler))));
@@ -8876,13 +8878,12 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
               and then not Restriction_Active (No_Dynamic_Attachment)
             then
                Protection_Subtype :=
-                  Make_Subtype_Indication (
-                    Sloc => Loc,
-                    Subtype_Mark => New_Reference_To
+                  Make_Subtype_Indication (Loc,
+                    Subtype_Mark =>
+                      New_Reference_To
                         (RTE (RE_Dynamic_Interrupt_Protection), Loc),
                     Constraint   =>
-                      Make_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint (
-                        Sloc => Loc,
+                      Make_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint (Loc,
                         Constraints => New_List (Entry_Count_Expr)));
 
             --  Type has explicit entries or generated primitive entry wrappers
@@ -8896,11 +8897,10 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
                      Protection_Subtype :=
                         Make_Subtype_Indication (Loc,
                           Subtype_Mark =>
-                            New_Reference_To (RTE (RE_Protection_Entries),
-                              Loc),
+                            New_Reference_To
+                              (RTE (RE_Protection_Entries), Loc),
                           Constraint   =>
-                            Make_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint (
-                              Sloc => Loc,
+                            Make_Index_Or_Discriminant_Constraint (Loc,
                               Constraints => New_List (Entry_Count_Expr)));
 
                   when System_Tasking_Protected_Objects_Single_Entry =>
@@ -8969,9 +8969,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
       --  internal operations.
 
       E_Count := 0;
-
       Comp := First (Visible_Declarations (Pdef));
-
       while Present (Comp) loop
          if Nkind (Comp) = N_Subprogram_Declaration then
             Sub :=
@@ -9080,7 +9078,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
             --  Collect pointers to the protected subprogram and the barrier
             --  of the current entry, for insertion into Entry_Bodies_Array.
 
-            Append (
+            Append_To (Expressions (Entries_Aggr),
               Make_Aggregate (Loc,
                 Expressions => New_List (
                   Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
@@ -9088,9 +9086,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
                     Attribute_Name => Name_Unrestricted_Access),
                   Make_Attribute_Reference (Loc,
                     Prefix         => New_Reference_To (Edef, Loc),
-                    Attribute_Name => Name_Unrestricted_Access))),
-              Expressions (Entries_Aggr));
-
+                    Attribute_Name => Name_Unrestricted_Access))));
          end if;
 
          Next (Comp);
@@ -12935,9 +12931,7 @@ package body Exp_Ch9 is
       --  any protected entry (family) of subprogram. Note for the lock-free
       --  implementation, the Protection object is not needed anymore.
 
-      if Is_Protected
-        and then not Uses_Lock_Free (Conc_Typ)
-      then
+      if Is_Protected and then not Uses_Lock_Free (Conc_Typ) then
          declare
             Prot_Ent : constant Entity_Id := Make_Temporary (Loc, 'R');
             Prot_Typ : RE_Id;

gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb

@@ -944,16 +944,14 @@ package body Sem_Ch13 is
                      --  Set the Uses_Lock_Free flag to True if there is no
                      --  expression or if the expression is True.
 
-                     if No (Expr)
-                       or else Is_True (Static_Boolean (Expr))
-                     then
+                     if No (Expr) or else Is_True (Static_Boolean (Expr)) then
                         Set_Uses_Lock_Free (E);
                      end if;
 
                      goto Continue;
                   end if;
 
-                  --  For all of these aspects we just create a matching pragma
+                  --  For all other aspects we just create a matching pragma
                   --  and insert it, if the expression is missing or set to
                   --  True. If the expression is False, we can ignore the
                   --  aspect with the exception that in the case of a derived

gcc/ada/sem_ch9.adb

@@ -70,9 +70,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch9 is
    function Allows_Lock_Free_Implementation
      (N        : Node_Id;
       Complain : Boolean := False) return Boolean;
-   --  This dispatch routine return True if N satisfies the following list of
-   --  lock-free restrictions for protected type declaration and protected
-   --  body:
+   --  This routine returns True iff N satisfies the following list of lock-
+   --  free restrictions for protected type declaration and protected body:
    --
    --    1) Protected type declaration
    --         May not contain entries
@@ -87,8 +86,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch9 is
    --            May not contain loop statements or procedure calls
    --            Function calls and attribute references must be static
    --
-   --  If Complain is set to True, an error message is issued when return
-   --  False.
+   --  If Complain is True, an error message is issued when False is returned
 
    procedure Check_Max_Entries (D : Node_Id; R : All_Parameter_Restrictions);
    --  Given either a protected definition or a task definition in D, check
@@ -134,9 +132,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch9 is
       --  flag. When Complain is True, an aspect Lock_Free forces the lock-free
       --  implementation. In that case, the debug flag is not needed.
 
-      if not Complain
-        and then not Debug_Flag_9
-      then
+      if not Complain and then not Debug_Flag_9 then
          return False;
       end if;
 
@@ -235,7 +231,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch9 is
       --  Protected body case
 
       else
-         declare
+         Protected_Body_Case : declare
             Decls         : constant List_Id   := Declarations (N);
             Pid           : constant Entity_Id := Corresponding_Spec (N);
             Prot_Typ_Decl : constant Node_Id   := Parent (Pid);
@@ -392,6 +388,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch9 is
                end if;
             end Satisfies_Lock_Free_Requirements;
 
+         --  Start of processing for Protected_Body_Case
+
          begin
             Decl := First (Decls);
 
@@ -409,7 +407,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch9 is
 
                Next (Decl);
             end loop;
-         end;
+         end Protected_Body_Case;
       end if;
 
       return True;
@@ -1709,8 +1707,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch9 is
       End_Scope;
 
       --  When a Lock_Free aspect forces the lock-free implementation, check N
-      --  meets all the lock-free restrictions. Otherwise,
-      --  Allows_Lock_Free_Implementation issue an error message.
+      --  meets all the lock-free restrictions. Otherwise, an error message is
+      --  issued by Allows_Lock_Free_Implementation.
 
       if Uses_Lock_Free (Defining_Identifier (N)) then
          if not Allows_Lock_Free_Implementation (N, Complain => True) then