name-lookup.c (qualified_lookup_using_namespace): Consider strong using…

name-lookup.c (qualified_lookup_using_namespace): Consider strong using directives even if we've already found a binding.

* name-lookup.c (qualified_lookup_using_namespace): Consider
strong using directives even if we've already found a binding.

From-SVN: r75599

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

+2004-01-09  Alexandre Oliva  <aoliva@redhat.com>
+
+	* name-lookup.c (qualified_lookup_using_namespace): Consider
+	strong using directives even if we've already found a binding.
+
 2004-01-09  Mark Mitchell  <mark@codesourcery.com>
 
 	* cp-tree.h (cxx_expand_expr): Change prototype.

gcc/cp/name-lookup.c

 /* Definitions for C++ name lookup routines.
-   Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   Copyright (C) 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
    Contributed by Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
 
 This file is part of GCC.
@@ -3789,12 +3789,17 @@ qualified_lookup_using_namespace (tree name, tree scope, cxx_binding *result,
       seen = tree_cons (scope, NULL_TREE, seen);
       if (binding)
         result = ambiguous_decl (name, result, binding, flags);
-      if (!result->value && !result->type)
-	/* Consider using directives.  */
+
+      /* Consider strong using directives always, and non-strong ones
+	 if we haven't found a binding yet.  ??? Shouldn't we consider
+	 non-strong ones if the initial RESULT is non-NULL, but the
+	 binding in the given namespace is?  */
       for (usings = DECL_NAMESPACE_USING (scope); usings;
 	   usings = TREE_CHAIN (usings))
 	/* If this was a real directive, and we have not seen it.  */
 	if (!TREE_INDIRECT_USING (usings)
+	    && ((!result->value && !result->type)
+		|| is_associated_namespace (scope, TREE_PURPOSE (usings)))
 	    && !purpose_member (TREE_PURPOSE (usings), seen))
 	  todo = tree_cons (TREE_PURPOSE (usings), NULL_TREE, todo);
       if (todo)