cp-tree.h (setup_vtbl_ptr): Move prototype to semantics.c section.

cp:
	* cp-tree.h (setup_vtbl_ptr): Move prototype to semantics.c
	section.
	* init.c (emit_base_init): Remove incorrect comment about
	virtual bases.
	* method.c (make_thunk): Fix comment alignment.

From-SVN: r39679

gcc/cp/ChangeLog

 2001-02-14  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@codesourcery.com>
 
+	* cp-tree.h (setup_vtbl_ptr): Move prototype to semantics.c
+	section.
+	* init.c (emit_base_init): Remove incorrect comment about
+	virtual bases.
+	* method.c (make_thunk): Fix comment alignment.
+
+2001-02-14  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@codesourcery.com>
+
 	Kill remnants of this is variable.
 	* cp-tree.h (flag_this_is_variable): Remove.
 	* decl2.c (flag_this_is_variable): Remove.

gcc/cp/cp-tree.h

@@ -3927,7 +3927,6 @@ extern int copy_assignment_arg_p		PARAMS ((tree, int));
 extern void cplus_decl_attributes		PARAMS ((tree, tree, tree));
 extern tree constructor_name_full		PARAMS ((tree));
 extern tree constructor_name			PARAMS ((tree));
-extern void setup_vtbl_ptr			PARAMS ((tree, tree));
 extern void defer_fn            		PARAMS ((tree));
 extern tree get_temp_name			PARAMS ((tree));
 extern void finish_anon_union			PARAMS ((tree));
@@ -4318,7 +4317,7 @@ extern void prep_stmt                           PARAMS ((tree));
 extern void do_pushlevel                        PARAMS ((void));
 extern tree do_poplevel                         PARAMS ((void));
 extern void finish_mem_initializers             PARAMS ((tree));
-
+extern void setup_vtbl_ptr			PARAMS ((tree, tree));
 extern void clear_out_block                     PARAMS ((void));
 extern tree begin_global_stmt_expr              PARAMS ((void));
 extern tree finish_global_stmt_expr             PARAMS ((tree));

gcc/cp/init.c

@@ -696,10 +696,7 @@ sort_base_init (t, base_init_list, rbase_ptr, vbase_ptr)
 
    If there is a need for a call to a constructor, we must surround
    that call with a pushlevel/poplevel pair, since we are technically
-   at the PARM level of scope.
-
-   Note that emit_base_init does *not* initialize virtual base
-   classes.  That is done specially, elsewhere.  */
+   at the PARM level of scope.  */
 
 void
 emit_base_init (mem_init_list, base_init_list)