typo fix: Fix probablity, becuse, sucessor and destinarion typos [PR93912]

2020-02-25  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR other/93912
	* config/sh/sh.c (expand_cbranchdi4): Fix comment typo, probablity
	-> probability.
	* cfghooks.c (verify_flow_info): Likewise.
	* predict.c (combine_predictions_for_bb): Likewise.
	* bb-reorder.c (connect_better_edge_p): Likewise.  Fix comment typo,
	sucessor -> successor.
	(find_traces_1_round): Fix comment typo, destinarion -> destination.
	* omp-expand.c (expand_oacc_for): Fix comment typo, sucessors ->
	successors.
	* tree-ssa-loop-ch.c (should_duplicate_loop_header_p): Fix dump
	message typo, sucessors -> successors.
c/
	* gimple-parser.c (c_parser_gimple_parse_bb_spec_edge_probability):
	Rename last argument from probablity to probability.

gcc/ChangeLog

+2020-02-25  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+	PR other/93912
+	* config/sh/sh.c (expand_cbranchdi4): Fix comment typo, probablity
+	-> probability.
+	* cfghooks.c (verify_flow_info): Likewise.
+	* predict.c (combine_predictions_for_bb): Likewise.
+	* bb-reorder.c (connect_better_edge_p): Likewise.  Fix comment typo,
+	sucessor -> successor.
+	(find_traces_1_round): Fix comment typo, destinarion -> destination.
+	* omp-expand.c (expand_oacc_for): Fix comment typo, sucessors ->
+	successors.
+	* tree-ssa-loop-ch.c (should_duplicate_loop_header_p): Fix dump
+	message typo, sucessors -> successors.
+
 2020-02-25  Martin Sebor  <msebor@redhat.com>
 
 	* doc/extend.texi (attribute access): Correct an example.

gcc/bb-reorder.c

@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ find_traces_1_round (int branch_th, profile_count count_th,
 	  /* If the best destination has multiple successors or predecessors,
 	     don't allow it to be added when optimizing for size.  This makes
 	     sure predecessors with smaller index are handled before the best
-	     destinarion.  It breaks long trace and reduces long jumps.
+	     destination.  It breaks long trace and reduces long jumps.
 
 	     Take if-then-else as an example.
 		A
@@ -1023,8 +1023,8 @@ connect_better_edge_p (const_edge e, bool src_index_p, int best_len,
       e_index = e->src->index;
 
       /* We are looking for predecessor, so probabilities are not that
-	 informative.  We do not want to connect A to B becuse A has
-	 only one sucessor (probablity is 100%) while there is edge
+	 informative.  We do not want to connect A to B because A has
+	 only one successor (probability is 100%) while there is edge
 	 A' to B where probability is 90% but which is much more frequent.  */
       if (e->count () > cur_best_edge->count ())
 	/* The edge has higher probability than the temporary best edge.  */

gcc/c/ChangeLog

+2020-02-25  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
+
+	PR other/93912
+	* gimple-parser.c (c_parser_gimple_parse_bb_spec_edge_probability):
+	Rename last argument from probablity to probability.
+
 2020-02-13  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
 
 	PR c/93576

gcc/c/gimple-parser.c

@@ -149,12 +149,13 @@ static bool
 c_parser_gimple_parse_bb_spec_edge_probability (tree val,
 						gimple_parser &parser,
 						int *index,
-						profile_probability *probablity)
+						profile_probability
+						*probability)
 {
   bool return_p = c_parser_gimple_parse_bb_spec (val, index);
   if (return_p)
     {
-      *probablity = profile_probability::uninitialized ();
+      *probability = profile_probability::uninitialized ();
       /* Parse frequency if provided.  */
       if (c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_PAREN))
 	{
@@ -188,7 +189,7 @@ c_parser_gimple_parse_bb_spec_edge_probability (tree val,
 	    }
 
 	  unsigned int value = TREE_INT_CST_LOW (f);
-	  *probablity = profile_probability (value, quality);
+	  *probability = profile_probability (value, quality);
 
 	  c_parser_consume_token (parser);
 	  if (!c_parser_require (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN, "expected %<)%>"))

gcc/cfghooks.c

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ verify_flow_info (void)
 	  err = 1;
 	}
       /* FIXME: Graphite and SLJL and target code still tends to produce
-	 edges with no probablity.  */
+	 edges with no probability.  */
       if (profile_status_for_fn (cfun) >= PROFILE_GUESSED
           && !bb->count.initialized_p () && !flag_graphite && 0)
 	{
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ verify_flow_info (void)
 	      err = 1;
 	    }
 	  /* FIXME: Graphite and SLJL and target code still tends to produce
-	     edges with no probablity.  */
+	     edges with no probability.  */
 	  if (profile_status_for_fn (cfun) >= PROFILE_GUESSED
 	      && !e->probability.initialized_p () && !flag_graphite && 0)
 	    {

gcc/config/sh/sh.c

@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ expand_cbranchdi4 (rtx *operands, enum rtx_code comparison)
       lsw_taken = EQ;
       if (prob.initialized_p ())
 	{
-	  /* FIXME: This is not optimal.  We do not really know the probablity
+	  /* FIXME: This is not optimal.  We do not really know the probability
 	     that values differ by MCW only, but we should probably distribute
 	     probabilities more evenly.  */
 	  msw_skip_prob = rev_prob;

gcc/omp-expand.c

@@ -6029,7 +6029,7 @@ expand_oacc_for (struct omp_region *region, struct omp_for_data *fd)
   basic_block cont_bb = region->cont; /* BB ending in OMP_CONTINUE  */
   basic_block bottom_bb = NULL;
 
-  /* entry_bb has two sucessors; the branch edge is to the exit
+  /* entry_bb has two successors; the branch edge is to the exit
      block, fallthrough edge to body.  */
   gcc_assert (EDGE_COUNT (entry_bb->succs) == 2
 	      && BRANCH_EDGE (entry_bb)->dest == exit_bb);

gcc/predict.c

@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ combine_predictions_for_bb (basic_block bb, bool dry_run)
 
 
   /* If we have only one successor which is unknown, we can compute missing
-     probablity.  */
+     probability.  */
   if (nunknown == 1)
     {
       profile_probability prob = profile_probability::always ();

gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ch.c

@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ should_duplicate_loop_header_p (basic_block header, class loop *loop,
     {
       if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
 	fprintf (dump_file,
-		 "  Not duplicating bb %i: both sucessors are in loop.\n",
+		 "  Not duplicating bb %i: both successors are in loop.\n",
 		 loop->num);
       return false;
     }