cgraph.c (cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones): Tidy.

        * cgraph.c (cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones): Tidy.
        (cgraph_create_edge_including_clones): Likewise.
        * tree-inline.c (copy_bb): Operate on the correct edges
        when updating the callgraph.

From-SVN: r150234

gcc/ChangeLog

+2009-07-29  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
+
+	* cgraph.c (cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones): Tidy.
+	(cgraph_create_edge_including_clones): Likewise.
+	* tree-inline.c (copy_bb): Operate on the correct edges
+	when updating the callgraph.
+
 2009-07-29  Douglas B Rupp  <rupp@gnat.com>
 
 	* config/alpha/vms-cc.c: Deleted.

gcc/cgraph.c

@@ -654,8 +654,8 @@ cgraph_set_call_stmt (struct cgraph_edge *e, gimple new_stmt)
     }
 }
 
-/* Like cgraph_set_call_stmt but walk the clone tree and update all clones sharing
-   same function body.  */
+/* Like cgraph_set_call_stmt but walk the clone tree and update all
+   clones sharing the same function body.  */
 
 void
 cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones (struct cgraph_node *orig,
@@ -666,8 +666,10 @@ cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones (struct cgraph_node *orig,
 
   if (edge)
     cgraph_set_call_stmt (edge, new_stmt);
-  if (orig->clones)
-    for (node = orig->clones; node != orig;)
+
+  node = orig->clones;
+  if (node)
+    while (node != orig)
       {
 	struct cgraph_edge *edge = cgraph_edge (node, old_stmt);
 	if (edge)
@@ -690,29 +692,36 @@ cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones (struct cgraph_node *orig,
    same function body.  
    
    TODO: COUNT and LOOP_DEPTH should be properly distributed based on relative
-   frequencies of the clones.
-   */
+   frequencies of the clones.  */
 
 void
-cgraph_create_edge_including_clones (struct cgraph_node *orig, struct cgraph_node *callee,
-				     gimple stmt, gcov_type count, int freq,
-				     int loop_depth,
+cgraph_create_edge_including_clones (struct cgraph_node *orig,
+				     struct cgraph_node *callee,
+				     gimple stmt, gcov_type count,
+				     int freq, int loop_depth,
 				     cgraph_inline_failed_t reason)
 {
   struct cgraph_node *node;
+  struct cgraph_edge *edge;
 
   if (!cgraph_edge (orig, stmt))
-     cgraph_create_edge (orig, callee, stmt,
-     			 count, freq, loop_depth)->inline_failed = reason;
+    {
+      edge = cgraph_create_edge (orig, callee, stmt, count, freq, loop_depth);
+      edge->inline_failed = reason;
+    }
 
-  if (orig->clones)
-    for (node = orig->clones; node != orig;)
+  node = orig->clones;
+  if (node)
+    while (node != orig)
       {
         /* It is possible that we already constant propagated into the clone
 	   and turned indirect call into dirrect call.  */
         if (!cgraph_edge (node, stmt))
-	  cgraph_create_edge (node, callee, stmt, count, freq,
-			      loop_depth)->inline_failed = reason;
+	  {
+	    edge = cgraph_create_edge (node, callee, stmt, count,
+				       freq, loop_depth);
+	    edge->inline_failed = reason;
+	  }
 
 	if (node->clones)
 	  node = node->clones;

gcc/tree-inline.c

@@ -1496,23 +1496,27 @@ copy_bb (copy_body_data *id, basic_block bb, int frequency_scale,
 	     callgraph edges and update or duplicate them.  */
 	  if (is_gimple_call (stmt))
 	    {
-	      struct cgraph_edge *edge = cgraph_edge (id->src_node, orig_stmt);
+	      struct cgraph_edge *edge;
 	      int flags;
 
 	      switch (id->transform_call_graph_edges)
 		{
 		case CB_CGE_DUPLICATE:
+		  edge = cgraph_edge (id->src_node, orig_stmt);
 		  if (edge)
-		  cgraph_clone_edge (edge, id->dst_node, stmt,
+		    edge = cgraph_clone_edge (edge, id->dst_node, stmt,
 					      REG_BR_PROB_BASE, 1,
 					      edge->frequency, true);
 		  break;
 
 		case CB_CGE_MOVE_CLONES:
-		cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones (id->dst_node, orig_stmt, stmt);
+		  cgraph_set_call_stmt_including_clones (id->dst_node,
+							 orig_stmt, stmt);
+		  edge = cgraph_edge (id->dst_node, stmt);
 		  break;
 
 		case CB_CGE_MOVE:
+		  edge = cgraph_edge (id->dst_node, orig_stmt);
 		  if (edge)
 		    cgraph_set_call_stmt (edge, stmt);
 		  break;
@@ -1521,7 +1525,6 @@ copy_bb (copy_body_data *id, basic_block bb, int frequency_scale,
 		  gcc_unreachable ();
 		}
 
-	    edge = cgraph_edge (id->src_node, orig_stmt);
 	      /* Constant propagation on argument done during inlining
 		 may create new direct call.  Produce an edge for it.  */
 	      if ((!edge 
@@ -1532,17 +1535,17 @@ copy_bb (copy_body_data *id, basic_block bb, int frequency_scale,
 		{
 		  struct cgraph_node *dest = cgraph_node (fn);
 
-		/* We have missing edge in the callgraph.  This can happen in one case
-		   where previous inlining turned indirect call into direct call by
-		   constant propagating arguments.  In all other cases we hit a bug
-		   (incorrect node sharing is most common reason for missing edges.  */
+		  /* We have missing edge in the callgraph.  This can happen
+		     when previous inlining turned an indirect call into a
+		     direct call by constant propagating arguments.  In all
+		     other cases we hit a bug (incorrect node sharing is the
+		     most common reason for missing edges).  */
 		  gcc_assert (dest->needed || !dest->analyzed);
 		  if (id->transform_call_graph_edges == CB_CGE_MOVE_CLONES)
-		  cgraph_create_edge_including_clones (id->dst_node, dest, stmt,
-						       bb->count,
+		    cgraph_create_edge_including_clones
+		      (id->dst_node, dest, stmt, bb->count,
 		       compute_call_stmt_bb_frequency (id->dst_node->decl, bb),
-						       bb->loop_depth,
-						       CIF_ORIGINALLY_INDIRECT_CALL);
+		       bb->loop_depth, CIF_ORIGINALLY_INDIRECT_CALL);
 		  else
 		    cgraph_create_edge (id->dst_node, dest, stmt,
 					bb->count, CGRAPH_FREQ_BASE,
@@ -1556,7 +1559,6 @@ copy_bb (copy_body_data *id, basic_block bb, int frequency_scale,
 		}
 
 	      flags = gimple_call_flags (stmt);
-
 	      if (flags & ECF_MAY_BE_ALLOCA)
 		cfun->calls_alloca = true;
 	      if (flags & ECF_RETURNS_TWICE)