Commit 8982e39b by Jakub Jelinek

combine: Don't replace SET_SRC with REG_EQUAL note content if SET_SRC has side-effects [PR94873]

There were some discussions about whether REG_EQUAL notes are valid on insns with a single
set which contains auto-inc-dec side-effects in the SET_SRC and the majority thinks that
it should be valid.  So, this patch fixes the combiner to punt in that case, because otherwise
the auto-inc-dec side-effects from the SET_SRC are lost.

2020-05-06  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR rtl-optimization/94873
	* combine.c (combine_instructions): Don't optimize using REG_EQUAL
	note if SET_SRC (set) has side-effects.

	* gcc.dg/pr94873.c: New test.
parent 1b53c116
2020-05-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/94873
* combine.c (combine_instructions): Don't optimize using REG_EQUAL
note if SET_SRC (set) has side-effects.
2020-05-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 2020-05-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/94942 PR target/94942
......
...@@ -1485,6 +1485,7 @@ combine_instructions (rtx_insn *f, unsigned int nregs) ...@@ -1485,6 +1485,7 @@ combine_instructions (rtx_insn *f, unsigned int nregs)
if ((set = single_set (temp)) != 0 if ((set = single_set (temp)) != 0
&& (note = find_reg_equal_equiv_note (temp)) != 0 && (note = find_reg_equal_equiv_note (temp)) != 0
&& (note = XEXP (note, 0), GET_CODE (note)) != EXPR_LIST && (note = XEXP (note, 0), GET_CODE (note)) != EXPR_LIST
&& ! side_effects_p (SET_SRC (set))
/* Avoid using a register that may already been marked /* Avoid using a register that may already been marked
dead by an earlier instruction. */ dead by an earlier instruction. */
&& ! unmentioned_reg_p (note, SET_SRC (set)) && ! unmentioned_reg_p (note, SET_SRC (set))
......
2020-05-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/94873
* gcc.dg/pr94873.c: New test.
2020-05-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> 2020-05-05 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/94942 PR target/94942
......
/* PR rtl-optimization/94873 */
/* { dg-do run { target int128 } } */
/* { dg-options "-O -fno-merge-constants -fno-split-wide-types -fno-tree-fre" } */
__attribute__((noipa)) void
foo (const char *p, int q)
{
if (p[0] != '%' || p[1] != '0' || p[2] != '2' || p[3] != 'x' || p[4] != '\0')
__builtin_abort ();
#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
if ((unsigned char) q != 0x95)
__builtin_abort ();
#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
if ((unsigned char) q != 0)
__builtin_abort ();
#endif
}
int
main ()
{
union U { __int128 a; char b[sizeof (__int128)]; };
char x = ((union U){ .a = 0xF4409395252B9560ULL}).b[1];
for (unsigned i = 0; i < sizeof (x); i++)
foo ("%02x", i[(volatile unsigned char *) &x]);
return 0;
}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment