Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
riscv-gcc-1
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
lvzhengyang
riscv-gcc-1
Commits
65c247ee
Commit
65c247ee
authored
Sep 18, 2012
by
Janis Johnson
Committed by
Janis Johnson
Sep 18, 2012
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
* gcc.dg/vect/fast-math-pr35982.c: Skip check instead of xfail.
From-SVN: r191448
parent
672df680
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
3 additions
and
1 deletions
+3
-1
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+2
-0
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/fast-math-pr35982.c
+1
-1
No files found.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
View file @
65c247ee
2012-09-18 Janis Johnson <janisjo@codesourcery.com>
* gcc.dg/vect/fast-math-pr35982.c: Skip check instead of xfail.
* gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-101.c: Skip a check for an irrelevant
target instead of xfailing it.
* gcc.dg/vect/no-vfa-vect-102.c: Likewise.
...
...
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/fast-math-pr35982.c
View file @
65c247ee
...
...
@@ -21,5 +21,5 @@ float method2_int16 (struct mem *mem)
}
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect" { target { vect_extract_even_odd || vect_strided2 } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" {
xfail { vect_extract_even_odd || vect_strided2
} } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops" 1 "vect" {
target { ! { vect_extract_even_odd || vect_strided2 }
} } } } */
/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" } } */
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment