Commit 45044655 by Richard Stallman

*** empty log message ***

From-SVN: r1026
parent 29008b51
...@@ -2263,7 +2263,8 @@ evaluate_eq_attr (exp, value, insn_code, insn_index) ...@@ -2263,7 +2263,8 @@ evaluate_eq_attr (exp, value, insn_code, insn_index)
if (address_used) if (address_used)
{ {
if (! RTX_UNCHANGING_P (exp) && current_alternative_string) /* This had `&& current_alternative_string', which seems to be wrong. */
if (! RTX_UNCHANGING_P (exp))
return copy_rtx_unchanging (exp); return copy_rtx_unchanging (exp);
return exp; return exp;
} }
...@@ -2768,7 +2769,7 @@ simplify_test_exp (exp, insn_code, insn_index) ...@@ -2768,7 +2769,7 @@ simplify_test_exp (exp, insn_code, insn_index)
/* We have already simplified this expression. Simplifying it again /* We have already simplified this expression. Simplifying it again
won't buy anything unless we weren't given a valid insn code won't buy anything unless we weren't given a valid insn code
to process (i.e., we are canonicalizing something.). */ to process (i.e., we are canonicalizing something.). */
if (insn_code != -2 && current_alternative_string if (insn_code != -2 /* Seems wrong: && current_alternative_string. */
&& ! RTX_UNCHANGING_P (newexp)) && ! RTX_UNCHANGING_P (newexp))
return copy_rtx_unchanging (newexp); return copy_rtx_unchanging (newexp);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment