Commit 2e48874f by Volker Reichelt Committed by Volker Reichelt

reg-stack.c: Fix comment typo(s).

	* reg-stack.c: Fix comment typo(s).
	* tree-ssa-operands.c: Likewise.
	* tree-vectorizer: Likewise.

From-SVN: r102232
parent c72a1a86
2005-07-21 Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
* reg-stack.c: Fix comment typo(s).
* tree-ssa-operands.c: Likewise.
* tree-vectorizer: Likewise.
2005-07-21 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> 2005-07-21 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
* config/sh/symbian.c: Replace C++ style line comments with C * config/sh/symbian.c: Replace C++ style line comments with C
......
...@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ enum emit_where ...@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ enum emit_where
static basic_block current_block; static basic_block current_block;
/* In the current_block, whether we're processing the first register /* In the current_block, whether we're processing the first register
stack or call instruction, i.e. the the regstack is currently the stack or call instruction, i.e. the regstack is currently the
same as BLOCK_INFO(current_block)->stack_in. */ same as BLOCK_INFO(current_block)->stack_in. */
static bool starting_stack_p; static bool starting_stack_p;
......
...@@ -459,10 +459,10 @@ ssa_operand_alloc (unsigned size) ...@@ -459,10 +459,10 @@ ssa_operand_alloc (unsigned size)
} }
/* Make sure PTR is inn the correct immediate use list. Since uses are simply /* Make sure PTR is in the correct immediate use list. Since uses are simply
pointers into the stmt TREE, there is no way of telling if anyone has pointers into the stmt TREE, there is no way of telling if anyone has
changed what this pointer points to via TREE_OPERANDS (exp, 0) = <...>. changed what this pointer points to via TREE_OPERANDS (exp, 0) = <...>.
THe contents are different, but the the pointer is still the same. This The contents are different, but the pointer is still the same. This
routine will check to make sure PTR is in the correct list, and if it isn't routine will check to make sure PTR is in the correct list, and if it isn't
put it in the correct list. We cannot simply check the previous node put it in the correct list. We cannot simply check the previous node
because all nodes in the same stmt might have be changed. */ because all nodes in the same stmt might have be changed. */
...@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ correct_use_link (use_operand_p ptr, tree stmt) ...@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ correct_use_link (use_operand_p ptr, tree stmt)
{ {
bool stmt_mod = true; bool stmt_mod = true;
/* Find the first element which isn't a SAFE iterator, is in a different /* Find the first element which isn't a SAFE iterator, is in a different
stmt, and is not a a modified stmt, That node is in the correct list, stmt, and is not a modified stmt. That node is in the correct list,
see if we are too. */ see if we are too. */
while (stmt_mod) while (stmt_mod)
......
...@@ -1792,7 +1792,7 @@ reduction_code_for_scalar_code (enum tree_code code, ...@@ -1792,7 +1792,7 @@ reduction_code_for_scalar_code (enum tree_code code,
such that: such that:
1. operation is commutative and associative and it is safe to 1. operation is commutative and associative and it is safe to
change the the order of the computation. change the order of the computation.
2. no uses for a2 in the loop (a2 is used out of the loop) 2. no uses for a2 in the loop (a2 is used out of the loop)
3. no uses of a1 in the loop besides the reduction operation. 3. no uses of a1 in the loop besides the reduction operation.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment