* reload.c (find_reloads_address_part): Kill rtx obstack hackery.

From-SVN: r37062

gcc/ChangeLog

 2000-10-25  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
 
+	* reload.c (find_reloads_address_part): Kill rtx obstack hackery.
+
+2000-10-25  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
+
 	* simplify-rtx.c (simplify_relational_operation): Sign extend
 	low words before sign extending to high words.
 

gcc/reload.c

@@ -5525,18 +5525,7 @@ find_reloads_address_part (x, loc, class, mode, opnum, type, ind_levels)
     {
       rtx tem;
 
-      /* If this is a CONST_INT, it could have been created by a
-	 plus_constant call in eliminate_regs, which means it may be
-	 on the reload_obstack.  reload_obstack will be freed later, so
-	 we can't allow such RTL to be put in the constant pool.  There
-	 is code in force_const_mem to check for this case, but it doesn't
-	 work because we have already popped off the reload_obstack, so
-	 rtl_obstack == saveable_obstack is true at this point.  */
-      if (GET_CODE (x) == CONST_INT)
-	tem = x = force_const_mem (mode, GEN_INT (INTVAL (x)));
-      else
       tem = x = force_const_mem (mode, x);
-
       find_reloads_address (mode, &tem, XEXP (tem, 0), &XEXP (tem, 0),
 			    opnum, type, ind_levels, 0);
     }
@@ -5548,12 +5537,7 @@ find_reloads_address_part (x, loc, class, mode, opnum, type, ind_levels)
     {
       rtx tem;
 
-      /* See comment above.  */
-      if (GET_CODE (XEXP (x, 1)) == CONST_INT)
-	tem = force_const_mem (GET_MODE (x), GEN_INT (INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1))));
-      else
       tem = force_const_mem (GET_MODE (x), XEXP (x, 1));
-
       x = gen_rtx_PLUS (GET_MODE (x), XEXP (x, 0), tem);
       find_reloads_address (mode, &tem, XEXP (tem, 0), &XEXP (tem, 0),
 			    opnum, type, ind_levels, 0);