Commit e1b91e13 by haoyifan

haoyifan update intro

parent 250ea04e
......@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ vocabulary can express almost infinite concepts.}
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{fig/Figure1_motivation.pdf}
\caption{The distribution of compositionality for 100 emerged symbolic
\caption{The distribution of compositionality for 100 emergent
languages without
any induction. It can be observed that high compositional symbolic language
any induction. It can be observed that high compositional language
seldom emerged (e.g., $<5\%$ for compositionality $>0.99$). Moreover, varying
the vocabulary size does not affect the compositionality notably.}
\label{fig:induction}
......@@ -71,11 +71,11 @@ vocabulary can express almost infinite concepts.}
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
Prior studies focus on achieving high compositional symbolic language
Prior studies focus on achieving high compositional language
through \emph{deliberately handcrafted} inductions, e.g., additional rewards~\cite{},
constructed loss functions~\cite{}, structural input data~\cite{},
memoryless~\cite{}, and ease-of-teaching~\cite{}.
\note{Such optimization methodologies are driven by the challenges to generate high compositional symbolic without induction in an existing multi-agent environment.}
\note{Such optimization methodologies are driven by the challenges to generate high compositional language without induction in an existing multi-agent environment.}
Figure~\ref{fig:induction} reports the compositionality when training two agents
in the widely-used listener-speaker referential game~\cite{} for emerging 100
......@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ without any induction. Moreover, varying
the vocabulary size does not affect the compositionality notably.}
Though such unnatural inductions are useful, they prevent us from better understanding the mystery of
the emergence of language and even intelligence among our pre-human ancestors.
Yet, few works investigate the emergence of high compositional symbolic language
Yet, few works investigate the emergence of high compositional language
\emph{naturally}, i.e., without handcrafted inductions.
In other words, it is never clear whether \emph{natural}
environment and agents are sufficient for achieving high compositionality.
......@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ Regarding the theoretical analysis, we propose
a novel mutual information-based metric to measure the compositionality quantitatively.
%experimentally
Regarding the experimental validation, we exploit the relationship between agent
capacity and the compositionality of symbolic language that emerged
\emph{naturally} in our experiments.
capacity and the compositionality of \emph{naturally} emergent language
in our experiments.
%two different dedicated experiments, i.e., \note{XXX and XXX, are utilized for XXX}.
%Regarding the experimental validation, it is conducted on a listener-speaker
%referential game framework with eliminated unnatural inductions.
......@@ -210,16 +210,16 @@ can generate a more compositional language with a higher probability.}
In this paper, we made the following contributions:
\begin{itemize}[topsep=0pt,itemsep=0cm]
\item To our best knowledge, we are the first work to successfully achieve
high compositional symbolic
high compositional emergent
language naturally, without any deliberately handcrafted induction.
\item We analyze the compositionality of emerged symbolic language
\item We analyze the compositionality of emergent language
after removing deliberately handcrafted inductions.
\item We propose a novel mutual information-based metric to measure the
compositionality quantitatively, which is more reasonable.
\item We experimentally exploited the relationship between agent
capacity. Both theoretical analysis and
experimental results lead to a counter-intuitive conclusion that lower agent
capacity facilitates the emergence of symbolic language with higher
capacity facilitates the emergence of language with higher
compositionality.
\end{itemize}
......@@ -229,6 +229,6 @@ Section~\ref{sec:relatedwork} summarizes the related works.
Section~\ref{sec:thory}
introduces the experimental setup used in this study. Section~\ref{sec:mis}
describes our proposed novel mutual-information-based metric for measuring
the compositionality of symbolic language. Section~\ref{sec:exp} gives the
the compositionality of emergent language. Section~\ref{sec:exp} gives the
experimental results of the exploration for the relationship between agent
capacity and compositionality. Section~\ref{sec:con} concludes this paper.
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment