~

AAAI2021/tex/experiments.tex

@@ -67,12 +67,6 @@ more meanings, for the constraint from low capacity.
 %\subsection{Breakdown}
 %\label{ssec:language}
 
-\textbf{Breakdown into language teaching.}
-We further breakdown the learning process to investigate the language teaching
-scenario, where the Speaker teaches the Listener its fixed symbolic language.
-We define three symbolic languages in different compositionality for Speaker to
-teach, i.e., high (LA, $MIS=1$), mediate (LB, $MIS=0.83$), low (LC, $MIS=0.41$), see
-Figure~\ref{fig:bench}.  
 
 \begin{figure}[t]
   \centering
@@ -102,6 +96,13 @@ Figure~\ref{fig:bench}.
 %\end{figure}
 
 
+\textbf{Breakdown into language teaching.}
+We further breakdown the learning process to investigate the language teaching
+scenario, where the Speaker teaches the Listener its fixed symbolic language.
+We define three symbolic languages in different compositionality for Speaker to
+teach, i.e., high (LA, $MIS=1$), mediate (LB, $MIS=0.83$), low (LC, $MIS=0.41$), see
+Figure~\ref{fig:bench}.  
+
 Figure~\ref{fig:exp3} reports the accuracy of Listener, i.e., ratio of the correctly
 predicted symbols spoken by Speaker ($t=\hat(t)$), which varies with the
 training iterations under different agent capacities.